ted演讲中英文对照范文

2024-01-12

ted演讲中英文对照范文第1篇

Ihave spent the last years, trying to resolve two enigmas: why is productivity so disappointing in all the companies where I work? I have worked with more than 500 companies. Despite all the technological advance

computers,

IT,

communications, telecommunications, the internet.

Enigma number two: why is there so little engagement at work? Why do people feel so miserable, even actively disengaged? Disengaged their colleagues. Acting against the interest of their company. Despite all the affiliation events, the celebration, the people initiatives, the leadership development programs to train managers on how to better motivate their teams.

At the beginning, I thought there was a chicken and egg issue: because people are less engaged, they are less productive. Or vice versa, because they are less productive, we put more pressure and they are less engaged. But as we were doing our analysis we realized that there was a common root cause to these two issues that relates, in fact, to the basic pillars of management. The way we organize is based on two pillars.

The hard—structure, processes, systems. The soft—feeling, sentiments, interpersonal relationship, traits, personality. And whenever a company reorganizes, restructures, reengineers, goes through a cultural transformation program, it chooses these two pillars. Now we try to refine them, we try to combine them. The real issue is – and this is the answer to the two enigmas – these pillar are obsolete. Everything you read in business books is based either two of the other or their combine. They are obsolete. How do they work when you try to use these approaches in front of the new complexity of business? The hard approach, basically is that you start from strategy, requirement, structure, processes,

systems,

KPIs,

scorecards,

committees, headquarters, hubs, clusters, you name it. I forgot all the metrics, incentives, committees, middle offices and interfaces. What happens basically on the left, you have more complexity, the new complexity of business. We need quality, cost, reliability, speed. And every time there is a new requirement, we use the same approach. We create dedicated structure processed systems, basically to deal with the new complexity of business. The hard approach creates just complicatedness in the organization. Let’s take an example. An automotive company, the engineering division is a five-dimensional matrix. If you open any cell of the matrix, you find another 20-dimensional matrix. You have Mr. Noise, Mr. Petrol Consumption, Mr. Anti-Collision Propertise. For any new requirement, you have a dedicated function in charge of aligning engineers against the new requirement. What happens when the new requirement emerges? Some years ago, a new requirement appeared on the marketplace: the length of the warranty period. So therefore the requirement is repairability, making cars easy to repair. Otherwise when you bring the car to the garage to fix the light, if you have to remove the engine to access the lights, the car will have to stay one week in the garage instead of two hours, and the warranty budget will explode. So, what was the solution using the hard approach? If repairability is the rew requirement, the solution is to create a new function, Mr. Repairability. And Mr. Repairability creates the repairability process. With a repairability scorecard, with a repairability metric and eventually repairability incentive.That came on top of 25 other KPIs. What percentage of these people is variable compensation? Twenty percent at most, divided by 26 KPIs, repairability makes a difference of 0.8 percent. What difference did it make in their action, their choices to simplify? Zero. But what occurs for zero impact? Mr. Repairability, process, scorecard, evaluation, coordination with the 25 other coordinators to have zero impact. Now, in front of the new complexity of business, the only solution is not drawing box es with reporting lines. It is basically the interplay. How the parts work together. The connection, the interaction, the synapse. It is not skeleton of boxes, it is the nervous system of adaptiveness and intelligence. You know, you could call it cooperation, basically. Whenever people cooperate, they use less resources. In everything. You know, the repairability issue is a cooperation problem.

When you design cars, please take into account the need of those who will repair the cars in the after sales garage. When we don’t cooperate we need more time, more equipment, more system, more teams. We need – when procurement, supply chain, manufacturing don’t cooperate we need more stock, more investories, more working capital. Who will pay for that? Shareholder? Customers? No, they will refuse. So who is left? The employees, who have tocompensate through their super individual efforts for the lack of cooperation. Stress, burnout, they are overwhelmed, accidents. No wonder they disengage. How do the hard and the soft try to foster cooperation?

The hard: in banks, when there is problem between the back office and the front office, they don’t cooperate. What is the solution? They create a middle office.

What happens one years later? Instead of one problem between the back and front, now have to problems. Between the back and the middle and between the middle and the front. Plus I have to pay for the middle office. The hard approach is unable to foster cooperation. It can only add new boxes, new bones in the skeleton. The soft approach: to make people cooperate, we need to make then like each other. Improve interpersonal feelings, the more people laike each other, the more they will cooperate. It is totally worng. It even counterproductive.

Look, at home I have two TVs. Why? Precisely not to have to cooperate with my wife. Not to have to impose tradeoffs to my wife. And why I try not to impose tradeoffs to my wife is precisely because I love my wife. If I didn’t love my wife, one TV would be enough: you will watch my favorite football game, if you are not happy, how is the book or the door? The more we like each other, the more we avoid the real cooperation that would strain our relationships by imposing tough tradeoffs. And we go for a second TV or we escalate the decision above for arbitration.

Definitely, these approaches are obsolete. To deal with complexity, to enhance nervous system, we have created what we call the smart simplicity approach based on simple rules. Simple rule number one: understand what others do. What is their real work? We need go beyond the boxes, the job description, beyond the surface of the container, to understand the real content. Me, designer, if I put a wire here, I know that it will mean that we will have to remove the engine to access the lights. Second, you need to reinforce integrators. Integrators are not middle office, they are managers, existing managers that you reinforce so that they have power and interest to make others cooperate. How can you reinforce your managers as integrators? By removing layers. When there are too many layers people are too far from the action. Therefore they need KPIs, metrics, they need poor proxies for reality. They don’t understand reality and they add the complicatedness of metrics, KPIs. By removing rules—the bigger we are, the more we need integrators, therefore the less rules we must have, to give discretionary power to managers. And we do the opposite – the bigger we are, the more rules we create. And we end up with the Encyclopedia Britannica of rules. You need to increase the quanitity of power so that you can empower everybody to use their judgment, their intelligence. You must give more cards to people so that they have the critical mass of cards to take the risk to cooperate, to move out of insulation. Otherwise, they will withdraw. They will disengage. These rules, they come from game theory and organizational sociology. You can increase the shadow of the future. Create feedback loops that expose people to the consequences of their actions. This is what the automotive company did when they saw that Mr. Repairability had no impact. They said the design engineers: now, in the three years, when the new car is launched on the market, you will move to the after sales network, and become in charge of the warranty budget, and if the warranty budget explodes, it will explode in your face. Much more powerful than 0.8 percent variable compensation. You need also to increase reciprocity, by removing the buffers that make us self-sufficient. When you remove these buffers, you hold me by the nose, I hold you by the ear. We will cooperate. Remove the second TV. There are many second TVs at work that don’t create value, they just provide dysfunctional self-sufficiency.

You need to reward those who cooperate and blame those who don’t cooperate. The CEO of The Lego Group, JK, has a great way to use it. He say, blame is not for failure, it is for failing to help or ask for help. It changes everything. Suddenly it becomes in my interest to be transparent on my real weakness, my real forecast, because I know I will not be blamed if I fail, but if I fail to help or ask for help. When you do this, it has a lot of implications on organizational design. You stop drawing boxes, dotted lines, full lines; you look at their interplay.

ted演讲中英文对照范文第2篇

在来爱尔兰的前一晚,我应邀主持了中国达人秀在上海的体育场和八万现场观众。 猜猜谁是表演嘉宾?——苏珊大妈。我告诉她,“我明天要去爱尔兰了。” 她歌声犹如天籁。而且她还可以说点中文。 “送你葱。” 这不是“你好、谢谢”之类的日常用语。这组词翻译过来是免费给你青葱,为什么她要说这个呢?因为这是我们中国版的苏珊大妈很有名的一句歌词。

这位五十几岁的大妈在上海以贩卖蔬菜为生。她喜欢西方的歌剧,但是她不懂任何外语,所以她就把中文蔬菜名填做歌词。当她在体育场里 唱到今夜无人入眠的最后一句时,她唱的是“送你葱”。苏珊大妈和全场八万观众一起唱“送你葱”,多有意思的场面。 我想苏珊大妈和这位在上海做蔬菜买卖的都属于不同寻常的人。在业界所谓的娱乐圈,他们最不可能取得成功,但是他们的勇气和才华让他们成功了。一场秀,一个平台给了他们实现梦想的舞台。 与众不同不难,从不同的角度看我们都是不一样的。我认为与众不同是好的,因为你有不同的看法,这给你机会去产生不同的影响。

我们这代人有幸见证和参与了过去二三十年中国的历史性的转型。

我记得在九十年代,刚从大学毕业的我申请了一份在北京五星级酒店销售部的工作。在日本经理一个半小时的面试后,他最后说:“杨小姐,你有什么问题要问我吗?”我鼓起勇气,定定神然后问道:“您能告诉我销售部到底销售什么?”我对于五星级酒店的销售部的职责一点都摸不着头脑。那是我在五星级酒店的第一天。

同时,我和上千名大学女生参加了一场由中国中央电视台举办的史无前例的公开选拔。制作人告诉我们他们想找一位可爱,天真,美丽的新面孔。当轮到我时,我站起来说道,“为什么女孩在电视上必须是漂亮,甜美,无邪的,像个花瓶?为什么她们不能有她们的想法,她们自己的声音?”

我想我一定得罪了评委。但是事实上,我的发言给他们留下了深刻的印象。接下来我进入了第二轮的选拔,然后是第三轮,第四轮。在经过七轮的选拔后,我胜出了。成为了一个国家电视台黄金时段节目的主持人。

不管你们相不相信,那是中国电视上第一个节目可以允许主持人自由发挥而不是去读审查后的稿子。这个节目的观众人数高达两到三千万。

几年后,我决定去美国哥伦比亚大学进修。之后我有了自己的传媒公司,这是在我刚毕业的时候想都不敢想的。

我和我的团队做了很多事情。在过去的这些年,我采访了上千人。有时候有年轻人走过来对我说:“杨澜,你改变了我的生活。”我也为此而自豪。

今天我想讲讲在社交媒体这个大舞台上的年轻人

我知道你们在想什么,你们觉得我迷路了,马上就会有人走上台温和地把我带回我的座位上。(掌声)。我在迪拜总会遇上这种事。“来这里度假的吗,亲爱的?”(笑声)“来探望孩子的吗?这次要待多久呢?

恩,事实上,我希望能再待久一点。我在波斯湾这边生活和教书已经超过30年了。(掌声)这段时间里,我看到了很多变化。现在这份数据是挺吓人的,而我今天要和你们说的是有关语言的消失和英语的全球化。我想和你们谈谈我的朋友,她在阿布达比教成人英语。在一个晴朗的日子里,她决定带她的学生到花园去教他们一些大自然的词汇。但最后却变成是她在学习所有当地植物在阿拉伯语中是怎么说的。还有这些植物是如何被用作药材,化妆品,烹饪,香草。这些学生是怎么得到这些知识的呢?当然是从他们的祖父母,甚至曾祖父母那里得来的。不需要我来告诉你们能够跨代沟通是多么重要。 but sadly, today, languages are dying at an unprecedented rate. a language dies every 14 days. now, at the same time, english is the undisputed global language. could there be a connection? well i dont know. but i do know that ive seen a lot of changes. when i first came out to the gulf, i came to kuwait in the days when it was still a hardship post. actually, not that long ago. that is a little bit too early. but nevertheless, i was recruited by the british council along with about 25 other teachers. and we were the first non-muslims to teach in the state schools there in kuwait. we were brought to teach english because the government wanted to modernize the country and empower the citizens through education. and of course, the u.k. benefited from some of that lovely oil wealth. 但遗憾的是,今天很多语言正在以前所未有的速度消失。每14天就有一种语言消失,而与此同时,英语却无庸置疑地成为全球性的语言。这其中有关联吗?我不知道。但我知道的是,我见证过许多改变。初次来到海湾地区时,我去了科威特。当时教英文仍然是个困难的工作。其实,没有那么久啦,这有点太久以前了。总之,我和其他25位老师一起被英国文化协会聘用。我们是第一批非穆斯林的老师,在科威特的国立学校任教。我们被派到那里教英语,是因为当地政府希望国家可以现代化并透过教育提升公民的水平。当然,英国也能得到些好处,产油国可是很有钱的。 okay. now this is the major change that ive seen -- how teaching english has morphed from being a mutually english-speaking nation on earth. and why not? after all, the best education -- according to the latest world university rankings -- is to be found in the universities of the u.k. and the u.s. so everybody wants to have an english education, naturally. but if youre not a native speaker, you have to pass a test. 言归正传,我见过最大的改变,就是英语教学的蜕变如何从一个互惠互利的行为变成今天这种大规模的国际产业。英语不再是学校课程里的外语学科,也不再只是英国的专利。英语(教学)已经成为所有英语系国家追逐的潮流。何乐而不为呢?毕竟,最好的教育来自于最好的大学,而根据最新的世界大学排名,那些名列前茅的都是英国和美国的大学。所以自然每个人都想接受英语教育,但如果你不是以英文为母语,你就要通过考试。 now can it be right to reject a student on linguistic ability well, i dont think so. we english teachers reject them all the time. we put a stop sign, and we stop them in their tracks. they cant pursue their dream any longer, till they get english. now let me put it this way, if i met a dutch speaker who had the cure for cancer, would i stop him from entering my british university? i dont think so. but indeed, that is exactly what we do. we english teachers are the gatekeepers. and you have to satisfy us first that your english is good enough. now it can be dangerous to give too much power to a narrow segment of society. maybe the barrier would be too universal. 但仅凭语言能力就拒绝学生这样对吗?譬如如果你碰到一位天才计算机科学家,但他会需要有和律师一样的语言能力吗?我不这么认为。但身为英语老师的我们,却总是拒绝他们。我们处处设限,将学生挡在路上,使他们无法再追求自己的梦想,直到他们通过考试。现在容我换一个方式说,如果我遇到了一位只会说荷兰话的人,而这个人能治愈癌症,我会阻止他进入我的英国大学吗?我想不会。但事实上,我们的确在做这种事。我们这些英语老师就是把关的。你必须先让我们满意,使我们认定你的英文够好。但这可能是危险的。把太多的权力交由这么小的一群人把持,也许会令这种障碍太过普及。 okay. but, i hear you say, what about the research? its all in english. so the books are in english, the journals are done in english, but that is a self-fulfilling . it feeds the english requirement. and so it goes on. i ask you, what happened to translation? if you think about the islamic golden age, there was lots of translation then. they translated from latin and greek into arabic, into persian, and then it was translated on into the germanic languages of europe and the romance languages. and so light shone upon the dark ages of europe. now dont get me wrong; i am not against teaching english, all you english teachers out there. i love it that we have a global language. we need one today more than ever. but i am against using it as a barrier. do we really want to end up with 600 languages and the main one being english, or chinese? we need more than that. where do we draw the line? this system equates intelligence with a knowledge of english which is quite . 于是,我听到你们问但是研究呢?研究报告都要用英文。”的确,研究论著和期刊都要用英文发表,但这只是一种理所当然的现象。有英语要求,自然就有英语供给,然后就这么循环下去。我倒想问问大家,为什么不用翻译呢?想想伊斯兰的黄金时代,当时翻译盛行,人们把拉丁文和希腊文翻译成阿拉伯文或波斯文,然后再由拉伯文或波斯文翻译为欧洲的日耳曼语言以及罗曼语言。于是文明照亮了欧洲的黑暗时代。但不要误会我的意思,我不是反对英语教学或是在座所有的英语老师。我很高兴我们有一个全球性的语言,这在今日尤为重要。但我反对用英语设立障碍。难道我们真希望世界上只剩下600种语言,其中又以英文或中文为主流吗?我们需要的不只如此。那么我们该如何拿捏呢?这个体制把智能和英语能力画上等号这是相当武断的。

and i want to remind you that the giants upon whose shoulders todays stand did not have to have english, they didnt have to pass an english test. case in point, einstein. he, by the way, was considered remedial at school because he was, in fact, dyslexic. but fortunately for the world, he did not have to pass an english test. because they didnt start until 1964 with toefl, the american test of english. now its exploded. there are lots and lots of tests of english. and millions and millions of students take these tests every year. now you might think, you and me, those fees arent bad, theyre okay, but they are prohibitive to so many millions of poor people. so immediately, were rejecting them. 我想要提醒你们,扶持当代知识分子的这些“巨人肩膀不必非得具有英文能力,他们不需要通过英语考试。爱因斯坦就是典型的例子。顺便说一下,他在学校还曾被认为需要课外补习,因为他其实有阅读障碍。但对整个世界来说,很幸运的当时他不需要通过英语考试,因为他们直到1964年才开始使用托福。现在英语测验太泛滥了,有太多太多的英语测验,以及成千上万的学生每年都在参加这些考试。现在你会认为,你和我都这么想,这些费用不贵,价钱满合理的。但是对数百万的穷人来说,这些费用高不可攀。所以,当下我们又拒绝了他们。 it brings to mind a headline i saw recently: education: the great divide. now i get it, i understand why people would focus on english. they want to give their children the best chance in life. and to do that, they need a western education. because, of course, the best jobs go to people out of the western universities, that i put on earlier. its a circular thing. 这使我想起最近看到的一个新闻标题:“教育:大鸿沟”现在我懂了。我了解为什么大家都重视英语,因为他们希望给孩子最好的人生机会。为了达成这目的,他们需要西方教育。毕竟,不可否认,最好的工作都留给那些西方大学毕业出来的人。就像我之前说的,这是一种循环。

okay. let me tell you a story about two scientists, two english scientists. they were doing an experiment to do with genetics and the forelimbs and the hind limbs of animals. but they couldnt get the results they wanted. they really didnt know what to do, until along came a german scientist who realized that they were using two words for forelimb and hind limb, whereas genetics does not differentiate and neither does german. so bingo, problem solved. if you cant think a thought, you are stuck. but if another language can think that thought, then, by cooperating, we can achieve and learn so much more. 好,我跟你们说一个关于两位科学家的故事:有两位英国科学家在做一项实验,是关于遗传学的,以及动物的前、后肢。但他们无法得到他们想要的结果。他们真的不知道该怎么办,直到来了一位德国的科学家。他发现在英文里前肢和后肢是不同的二个字,但在遗传学上没有区别。在德语也是同一个字。所以,叮!问题解决了。如果你不能想到一个念头,你会卡在那里。但如果另一个语言能想到那念头,然后通过合作我们可以达成目的,也学到更多。

我的女儿从科威特来到英格兰,她在阿拉伯的学校学习科学和数学。那是所阿拉伯中学。在学校里,她得把这些知识翻译成英文,而她在班上却能在这些学科上拿到最好的成绩。这告诉我们,当外籍学生来找我们,我们可能无法针对他们所知道的给予赞赏,因为那是来自于他们母语的知识。当一个语言消失时,我们不知道还有什么也会一并失去。 this is -- i dont know if you saw it on cnn recently -- they gave the heroes award to a young kenyan shepherd boy who couldnt study at night in his village like all the village children,篇三:如何像ted一样做一次高大上的演讲 如何像ted一样做一次高大上的演讲?

今年是ted成立30周年,ted的出现改变了主题演讲艺术。目前,ted演讲节目在线观看量已达到每天两百万次,旗下各地相对独立的tedx更是在145个国家内广为传播,当提到高质量的公众演讲,你脑海中很可能在第一时间浮现ted的经典舞台。

那么如何做一个ted水平的演讲? carmine gallo在分析了500场ted演讲(总计150小时)、访谈了一些最受欢迎的ted演说家(演讲视频观看量达到近一千两百万次)、咨询了沟通交际方面的神经学家后,他找到了成功ted演讲的共同点。以下是carmine的建议: 1)分享你的激情。如果你准备的内容不能打动自己,就更别说激励他人了。深度挖掘你和话题间有深度意义的关联,不要害怕向观众表达你的热情。 2)至少分享三个故事。facebook首席运营官谢丽尔·桑德伯格说她最早在准备ted演讲时都是用的“堆积如山的事实和数据,没有一点私人故事”。一个朋友强烈建议讲讲她自己作为一个在职母亲所遇到的挑战,讲讲生活中发生在自己身边的事情和感受。桑德伯格据此调整了自己演讲内容,结果反响极好。这个建议也被体现在她的畅销书《向前一步》(leanin),引领了全球职场女性讨论。 hyeonseo lee的演讲:《my escape from north korea》一个朝鲜脱北者的经历 3)标题精简。在查阅了ted官网上所有1600个演讲的标题后,我很确定的说,没有一个演讲的标题超过140个字(这个数字很眼熟吧?)浏览次数最多的演讲:kenrobinson 《学校如何扼杀创造力》(how schools kills creativity), brene brown《脆弱的力量》(the power of vulnerability), 还有simonsinek 《出色领导如何激励行动》(how great leaders inspire action)„„这些都是简洁明晰的标题。如果你的演讲标题空泛,或者字数过多,那就再改改吧。 ken robinson爵士的演讲《学校如何扼杀创造力》是史上最受欢迎的ted演讲 4)用一点轻幽默。教育家ken robinson的演讲《学校如何扼杀创造力》是史上最受欢迎的ted演讲,观看次数超过两千万。虽然没有使用标准笑话,但是他在演讲中使用了风趣的自嘲:“我最近参加了一个聚会——而实际上,如果你属于教育领域,一般没人邀请你去晚上的聚会。”在演讲中使用幽默来让观众会心一笑。 martin jacques的演讲:《understanding the rise of china》是最受中国观众欢迎的ted演讲之一,看看一位西方学者如何看待中国民族、主权、社会等等问题。 5)创建多感官体验。要令人印象深刻?你不必刻意放一些触目惊心的图片。可以采用个人表演的方法,或者设计一两个让人意料之外的桥段。比如,比尔·盖茨有一次在他关于疟疾的演讲中,朝观众释放了一些蚊子(疟疾可通过蚊子叮咬传播)。这让人震惊的举动成为当晚头条,人们永远忘不了这场意料之外的演讲。 6)ppt中多用图片而不是文字。如果看过ted演讲,你就知道演讲者从来不会在ppt里放上密密麻麻的文字,取而代之的都是图片、折线图、动画和精心设计的几句话。少即是多。 7)坚持18分钟定律。即使比尔·盖茨或者桑德伯格站上舞台,18分钟也就是他们的所有。ted策展人chris anderson说18分钟足够了,这足够开展一个严肃的讨论,而对于吸引并保持人们的注意力来说,也几乎是极限了。 8)多加练习。有的ted演讲者为他们的18分钟演讲排练过200多遍,其中一个人在演讲过程中表现极佳,脱口秀女王欧普拉都看中了她。她现在的职业生涯都借力于奥普拉的支持和她那个出名的ted演讲。 9)不要装样子。大部分人都能分辨真假,你若装模做样,演讲像背书或朗诵,就会失去听众的好感,你应该保持真实,做自己。

也许你永远也不会被邀请去做一个ted演讲,但是如果你要做一个类似的演讲,做到以上几点,你就能更加激励你的听众,并离自己梦想更近。篇四:2016thomas suarez ted演讲稿中英文

2016thomas suarez ted演讲稿中英文 thomassuarez年纪12岁的他,制作iphoneapp的他被大家称之为小乔布斯,在ted上发表精彩演讲,讲述他的童年时代那些创作故事,下面是第一公文网小编整理的thomassuarezted演讲稿中英文

thomassuarezted演讲稿中英文 helloeveryone,mynameisthomassuarez. 我一直都对计算机与科技很入迷,我研制了一些适用于iphone,itouch以及ipad的应用。今天,我想与大家分享一些我研发出的应用。

myfirstappwasauniquefortunetellercalledearthfortunethatwoulddisplaydifferentcolorsofearthdependingonwhatyourfortunewas.myfavoriteandmostsuccessfulappisbustinjieber,whichis—(laughter)—whichisajustinbieberwhac-a-mole. 我最先研制出的应用是一个叫earthfortune的运势测试器,它能根据你的运势呈现不同颜色的地球图形我个人最喜欢、也是最成功的应用叫bustinjieber它是一个---(笑声)它是一个贾斯汀·比伯攻击器(whac-a-mole原意为打地鼠游戏)

icreateditbecausealotofpeopleatschooldislikedjustinbieberalittlebit,soidecidedtomaketheapp. 在学校里,我的很多同学都不太喜欢贾斯汀·比伯,所以我决定开发这样一个应用。 soiwenttoworkprogrammingit,andireleaseditjustbeforetheholidaysin2016. 于是我就开始写这个程序,并且在2016年圣诞假期和新年来临之前发布了这个应用。 alotofpeopleaskme,howdidimakethese?alotoftimesitsbecausethepersonwhoaskedthequestionwantstomakeanappalso. 很多人都问我,是怎样开发出这些应用的?很多情况下,那些问这个问题的人,其实也想开发应用。

alotofkidsthesedaysliketoplaygames,butnowtheywanttomakethem,anditsdifficult,becausenotmanykidsknowwheretogotofindouthowtomakeaprogram. 如今,很多的孩子都喜欢玩游戏,但是,现在他们也想制作游戏。这是很困难的,因为

很多孩子并不知道怎样找到制作软件的方法。

imean,forsoccer,youcouldgotoasoccerteam.forviolin,youcouldgetlessonsforaviolin.butwhatifyouwanttomakeanapp?andtheirparents,thekidsparentsmighthavedonesomeofthesethingswhentheywereyoung,butnotmanyparentshavewrittenapps. 打个比方,你想学踢足球,那你可以加入一支足球队。想学小提琴,你可以报个小提琴班。但如果你想开发一个应用呢?父母们年轻的时候也许踢过足球、或者学习过小提琴但没有多少父母写过应用吧! (laughter) (笑声)

wheredoyougotofindouthowtomakeanapp?well,thisishowiapproachedit.thisiswhatidid.firstofall,ivebeenprogramminginmultipleotherprogramminglanguagestogetthebasicsdown,suchaspython,c,java,etc. 那么你要怎样学习写应用呢?我是这样学习的,最开始时,我学习了用好几种语言来编程,由此而掌握了编程的基础知识,例如python语言、c语言以及java语言等等。

andthenapplereleasedtheiphone,andwithit,theiphonesoftwaredevelopmentkit,andthesoftwaredevelopmentkitisasuiteoftoolsforcreatingandprogramminganiphoneapp.thisopenedupawholenewworldofpossibilitiesforme,andafterplayingwiththesoftwaredevelopmentkitalittlebit,imadeacoupleapps,imadesometestapps. 之后苹果发行了iphone,随之还发布了iphone软件开发工具,这套软件开发工具是一套工具,可用于开发与研制iphone应用。这为我开启了一个全新充满可能性的世界,在稍稍摆弄过这套软件开发工具之后,我开发出了一些应用,以及一些测试的应用。

oneofthemhappenedtobeearthfortune,andiwasreadytoputearthfortuneontheappstore,andsoipersuadedmyparentstopaythe99dollarfeetobeabletoputmyappsontheappstore. earthfortune便是其中之一。在我准备好要将这个应用放到appstore上去时,我说服我的父母为我支付了99美元的费用,这样我就能让这个应用在appstore上上线了。

theyagreed,andnowihaveappsontheappstore.ivegottenalotofinterestandencouragementfrommyfamily,friends,teachersandevenpeopleattheapplestore,andthatsbeenahugehelptome. 他们同意了,于是现在appstore上便有了我开发的应用。我的父母、朋友和老师给了我很多灵感与鼓励,甚至连appstore的用户都给了我许多鼓励,这些对于我来说都是莫大的帮助。

ivegottenalotofinspirationfromstevejobs,andivestartedanappclubatschool,andateacheratmyschooliskindlysponsoringmyappclub. 我也从乔布斯那里得到了很多的启发。在学校里,我建立一个app社团,学校里的一名老师支持着我的这个社团。

学校里学生都可以来学习如何设计应用。这样我就能与其他人一起分享我的经验。目前有一系列叫做pilotprogram的应用程序,(为各大学校利用ipad教学提供技术支持的应用软件)有些地区可下载使用这些程序。

imfortunateenoughtobepartofone.abigchallengeis,howshouldtheipadsbeused,andwhatappsshouldweputontheipads? 幸运的是,我所在的地方正是这些地区之一。而我们目前面临的挑战是应该怎样利用ipad,以及ipad上应该有哪些应用程序。 soweregettingfeedbackfromteachersattheschooltoseewhatkindofappstheydlike. 所以我们对学校教师进行了调研,获得了关于他们喜欢什么样应用的反馈。

whenwedesigntheappandwesellit,itwillbefreetolocaldistrictsandotherdistrictsthatwesellto,allthemoneyfromthatwillgointothelocaledfoundations. 当我们设计完这些应用并将其出售时,当地的学校可以免费使用,而从收费地区获得的收入,则会捐赠给当地的教育机构。 thesedays,studentsusuallyknowalittlebitmorethanteacherswiththetechnology. 如今,学生们所掌握的科技通常会比老师多那么一点点。 (laughter) (笑声) so-- 所以-- (laughter) (笑声) --sorry--(laughter)-- 抱歉--(笑声)

sothisisaresourcetoteachers,andeducatorsshouldrecognizethisresourceandmakegooduseofit.idliketofinishupbysayingwhatidliketodointhefuture. 所以这对老师而言是一种资源,教育工作者们应该了解这些资源,并充分地利用它们最后,我想谈谈我未来的计划。

首先,我要开发出更多的应用、更多的游戏,目前我正在与一个第三方公司合作开发app,我想开始安卓系统应用的编程与开发,同时,我也要继续我的app社团,为同学们找到其他的方式,共同分享知识。 thankyou. 谢谢! thomassuarezted演讲视频

相关推荐:

ted演讲稿大全篇五:杨澜ted演讲:重塑中国的年轻一代(中英文对照) 杨澜ted演讲:重塑中国的年轻一代(中英文对照) the night before i was heading for scotland, i was invited to host the final of “china’s got talent” show in shanghai with the 80,000 live audience in the stadium. guess who was the performing guest? susan boyle. and i told her, “i’m going to scotland the next day.” she sang beautifully, and she even managed to say a few words in chinese. [chinese] so it’s not like “hello” or “thank you,” that ordinary stuff. it means “green onion for free.” why did she say that? because it was a line from our chinese parallel susan boyle — a 50-some year-old woman, a vegetable vendor in shanghai, who loves singing western opera, but she didn’t understand any english or french or italian, so she managed to fill in the lyrics with vegetable names in chinese. (laughter) and the last sentence of nessun dorma that she was singing in the stadium was “green onion for free.” so [as] susan boyle was saying that, 80,000 live audience sang together. that was hilarious. 来苏格兰(做ted讲演)的前夜,我被邀请去上海做”中国达人秀“决赛的评委。在装有八万现场观众的演播厅里,在台上的表演嘉宾居然是(来自苏格兰的,因参加英国达人秀走红的)苏珊大妈(susan boyle)。我告诉她,“我明天就要启程去苏格兰。” 她唱得很动听,还对观众说了几句中文,她并没有说简单的”你好“或者”谢谢“,她说的是——“送你葱”(song ni cong)。为什么?这句话其实来源于中国版的“苏珊大妈”——一位五十岁的以卖菜为生,却对西方歌剧有出奇爱好的上海中年妇女(蔡洪平)。这位中国的苏珊大妈并不懂英文,法语或意大利文,所以她将歌剧中的词汇都换做中文中的蔬菜名,并且演唱出来。在她口中,歌剧《图兰朵》的最后一句便是“song ni cong”。当真正的英国苏珊大妈唱出这一句“中文的”《图兰朵》时,全场的八万观众也一起高声歌唱,场面的确有些滑稽(hilarious)。 so i guess both susan boyle and this vegetable vendor in shanghai belonged to otherness. they were the least expected to be successful in the business called entertainment, yet their courage and talent brought them through. and a show and a platform gave them the stage to realize their dreams. well, being different is not that difficult. we are all different from different perspectives. but i think being different is good, because you present a different point of view. you may have the chance to make a difference. 我想susan boyle和这位上海的买菜农妇的确属于人群中的少数。她们是最不可能在演艺界成功的,而她们的勇气和才华让她们成功了,这个节目和舞台给予了她们一个实现个人梦想的机会。这样看来,与众不同好像没有那么难。从不同的方面审视,我们每个人都是不同的。但是我想,与众不同是一件好事,因为你代表了不一样的观点,你拥有了做改变的机会。 my generation has been very fortunate to witness and participate in the historic transformation of china that has made so many changes in the past 20, 30 years. i remember that in the year of 1990, when i was graduating from college, i was applying for a job in the sales department of the first five-star hotel in beijing, great wall sheraton — it’s still there. so after being interrogated by this japanese manager for a half an hour, he finally said, “so, miss yang, do you have any questions to ask me?” i summoned my courage and poise and said, “yes, but could you let me know, what actually do you sell?” i didn’t have a clue what a sales department was about in a five-star hotel. that was the first day i set my foot in a five-star hotel. 我这一代中国人很幸运的目睹并且参与了中国在过去二三十年中经历的巨变。我记得1990年,当我刚大学毕业时,我申请了当时北京的第一家五星级酒店——长城喜来登酒店的销售部门的工作。这家酒店现在仍在北京。当我被一位日本籍经理面试了一个半小时之后,他问到,“杨小姐,你有什么想问我的吗?”,我屏住呼吸,问道“是的,你能告诉我,具体我需要销售些什么吗?” 当时的我,对五星级酒店的销售部门没有任何概念,事实上,那是我第一次进到一家五星级酒店。 我当时也在参加另一场“面试”,中国国家电视台的首次公开试镜,与我一起参与选拔的还有另外1000名大学女毕业生。节目制作人说,他们希望找到一位甜美,无辜(lol),漂亮的新鲜面孔。轮到我的时候,我问道“为什么在电视屏幕上,女性总应该表现出甜美漂亮,甚至是服从性的一面?为什么她们不能有她们自己的想法和声音?“我觉得我的问题甚至有点冒犯到了他。但实际上,他们对我的表现印象深刻。我进入了第二轮选拔,第三轮,第四轮,直至最后的第七场选拔,我是唯一一个走到最后的试镜者。我从此走上了国家电视台黄金时段的荧幕。你可能不相信,但在当时,我所主持的电视节目是中国第一个,不让主持人念已经审核过的稿件的节目(掌声)。我每周需要面对两亿到三亿左右的电视观众。 olympic games. i was representing the shanghai expo. i saw china embracing the world and vice versa. but then sometimes i’m thinking, what are today’s young generation up to? how are they different, and what are the differences they are going to make to shape the future of china, or at large, the world? government-backed institutions, which lacked transparency in the past. and also it showed us the power and the impact of social media as microblog. so making a living is not that easy for young people. college graduates are not in short supply. in urban areas, college graduates find the starting salary is about 400 u.s. dollars a month, while the average rent is above $500. so what do they do? they have to share space — squeezed in very limited space to save money — and they call themselves “tribe of ants.” and for those who are ready to get married and buy their apartment, they figured out they have to work for 30 to 40 years to afford their first apartment. that ratio in america would only cost a couple five years to earn, but in china it’s 30 to 40 years with the skyrocketing real estate price. 所以对于年轻人而言,生活并不是容易。本科毕业生也不在是紧缺资源。在城市中,本科生的月起薪通常是400美元(2500人民币),而公寓的平均月租金却是500美元。所以他们的解决方式是合租——挤在有限的空间中以节省开支,他们叫自己”蚁族。“ 对于那些准备好结婚并希望购买一套公寓的中国年轻夫妇而言,他们发现他们必须要不间断的工作30到40年才可以负担得起一套公寓。对于同样的美国年轻夫妇而言,他们只需要五年时间。 在近两亿的涌入城市的农民工中,他们中的60%都是年轻人。他们发现自己被夹在了城市和农村中,大多数人不愿意回到农村,但他们在城市也找不到归属感。他们工作更长的时间却获得更少的薪水和社会福利。他们也更容易面临失业,受到通货膨胀,银行利率,人民币升值的影响,甚至美国和欧盟对于中国制造产品的抵制也会影响到他们。去年,在中国南方的一个制造工厂里,有十三位年轻的工人选择了结束自己的生命,一个接一个,像一场传染病。他们轻生的原因各有不同,但整个事件提醒了中国社会和政府,需要更多的关注这些在精神上和生理上都与外界脱节的年轻农民工人。

ted演讲中英文对照范文第3篇

3分钟ted演讲稿做自己1

大家好!

传说中有一种孩子,叫做“别人家的孩子”,家长们都爱“别人家的孩子”。于是,我们习惯了仰望,别人学习好,别人长得漂亮,别人有钱,别人气质好,别人……

有些人习惯于仰望别人,回头却发现自己正被别人仰望着。其实并非一无是处,你只是没有发现自己,认识自我。学会自信,学会勇敢地昂首挺胸,认真的做自己。而不是一味仰望别人的背影,那样只会影响自己的发挥。

我有一个邻居,她非常腼腆,很少跟陌生人说话。很小的时候,妈妈就离开了她,让她长期与爸爸一同生活。她的周围有很多小朋友,他们有爸爸也有妈妈。她很伤心,她也有妈妈,而她的妈妈不喜欢她。她妈妈选择了离开她和爸爸,与别人生活在一起。

我呢,属于玩得很疯的那种人,在小伙伴里,就我最活跃。经常听到父母在茶余饭后讨论:她妈妈又跟谁走了,多长时间没回来过,又把家里的钱卷走了之类的。

她的成绩很优秀。于是,经常往她家跑,带着作业本去问她题目。一开始她很害羞。渐渐地,除了教我题目,还跟我说一些有趣的事情。后来,除了带作业本去,还带一些小玩具小零食和她一起分享。最后,我们成了无话不谈的好朋友。她的。成绩越来越好,越来越突出,人缘也好了不少。她比我高一届,所以经常能在学校碰面,看着她的朋友越来越多,走路时与别人谈笑风生。再后来,她考上东中,而我在创新!我也不得不仰望她了,但在生活中,在学校里,我还是玩得开的,就是成绩平平了点。不过,我是个乐天派,别人考好大学,我可以考个好大专啊,反正“三百六十行,行行出状元”,靠本领赚到钱才是硬道理。

她现在生活得很幸福,她有父爱,有友情,有同学爱,本身也很优秀。遇到难题,她也不再闪躲,而是积极的寻找方法解决。

我们每个人都是不完美的,总有这样或那样的缺点,但只要克服缺点不断努力,就能不断走向完美。只有你想不到的,没有你做不到的,对自己要充满信心,自信做好你自己。

3分钟ted演讲稿做自己2

大家好!

蜗牛背着重重的壳在一棵葡萄树上爬呀爬,树上的两只黄鹂鸟笑话它说:“葡萄成熟还早得很,现在上来干什么?”蜗牛走自己的路,不管其他动物们说什么,它的目标很坚定,等到它爬上去的时候葡萄就成熟了。我们就要像蜗牛那样走自己的路,有坚定的目标,不论发生什么,旁人说什么,不动摇那颗初心。

牛顿小时候成绩差,是老师、同学眼中的学困生,但他爱好科学,梦想当科学家。同学们都嘲讽他。他选择做自己,坚持自己当科学家的道路,实验、归纳、总结,发现了万有引力定律。倘若没有当初坚持做自己毫不动摇的决心,倘若面对同学的嘲讽放弃梦想,就没有这么一个举世闻名的科学家。

我们每个人都是不一样的,要相信“我就是我,是颜色不一样的烟火”。适合自己的对于他人来说不一定适合,他人厌恶的短板也许正是我们的`长处。根据自己的特点去选择或取舍,不要盲目听从他人,走自己最坚定的路。

马上要升入高中了,我们这一届赶上不分文理科。同学们大多弃理从文,我要做我自己,我选择自己喜欢的物理、化学、生物三门。别人都说:“纯理科,你给自己挖坑往下跳啊。”“走自己的路,让别人去说吧。”适合自己的才是的,不忘初心,做自己。

3分钟ted演讲稿做自己3

大家晚上好!

我是来自工管1101班的汤亚,现任班上的学习委员。我相信每个人都有一份属于自己的志向,也许远大、也许平凡,那么,同学们,属于你的那份志向又能散发出多少光芒去指引你的未来呢?今天我站在这里,也并不是想要向你们证明我有多么好,我只是想让大家知道我的努力,和我一起分享我的收获。

其实有时候习惯也是一个可怕的东西,我曾经询问过有些平常喜欢逃课的人,他们的逃课心得是,可能第一逃课还是情有所原,可是当他们逃了第一次,就会想要逃第二次,第三次……慢慢的就成了一种习惯,一种惰性。可能好多人都会认为,作为一个三本的学生,混个本科的文凭,每天混日子过着就行了,学这些东西也没什么用,反正现在很多公司就已经认定三本的学生不如一本二本的,因此,现在大学越来越多的人的追求变成不挂科就行,临考前临时抱佛脚,在寝室床头”挂柯南”,考前发条说说求人品大爆发等等。可是在我看来,一个人可以没有高学历,可以没有大学文化,但是绝不可以没有上进心和奋斗目标,否则你就会永远堕落,人生就没有多大意义。正因为我们是三本的学生,我们更应该比其他的人付出更多的努力,努力证明给社会看,我们也可以比一本二本的强其实大学里面学习的并不只是书本上的知识,更是一种态度,一种坚持。

可能大学里的上课,学习,考试都是枯燥的,但是我们怎样去忍耐这一种枯燥,怎样去坚持这一份枯燥呢?这是我们每一个人都应该学习的我是一个没有什么远大的目标和志向的人,什么一定要去哪里工作,一定要去哪里留学,一定要考哪里的研,我都没有想过,也不想去想,因为我总觉得这是一种空想,一切都在变换中,比起这些,我更喜欢给自己制定一些小目标,然后奔着自己的小目标努力前进。我也是一个自制力比较强的人,从小到大父母从没管过我学习,现在也是一样,他们对我完全是一种“放养型“,一直以来我都是自己给自己压力,自己给自己动力。现在也如此,从大一第一个学期开始,我从来没有逃过一节课,上课坐在前面几排,上课跟着老师来,考试前好好复习,每次考试前,我都会画一个表格,把每天的时间都安排好,然后按着安排的来过,这样把每天都规划好,会让我觉得每天都过得很充实。

我们寝室的人给我取过一个外号,叫做“作业狂”因为好几次我在寝室她在玩手机玩电脑的时候就看到我在做作业,其实我也不是因为喜欢做作业,也不是那种死读书,我只是一种急性子,不喜欢拖拉,不喜欢积压要做的事情,我喜欢尽快把要做的事情做好,今日事今日毕,因为我总觉得明天还会有更多的事情等着我去做。而且我一直相信一句话“只要付出了就一定会有回报”,所以在大一一年付出下,我得到的回报是大一一学年的综合测评在班级第一,专业第二。但是我从没有因此觉得我有多么厉害,我觉得这是我付出努力以后应得的,而且我也觉得我并不特别,因为我做得到的每个人其实都可以做到。在平时空余我也还会做一些兼职,做得最多的就是发传单,可能这个看上去是一个很容易的活,其实不然,其中的难受只有做过的人才知道。每次伸手递出传单,每声“看一下,谢谢!”所换来的却是不理不睬,不过我相信现在大部分人都发过传单,也正因为这样,现在发传单也就轻松不少,至少还会有人主动去问你要,会有些人还说要多拿几张来减轻发传单人的工作量,收到传单以后还会说一声“谢谢”。所以,只有经历了,才会懂得理解。

以后会发生什么,我不知道,但是我只知道一件事,那就是不管遇到什么困难,我都会认真对待每一件事,勇往直前,坚持坚持再坚持,努力努力在努力,做好我自己。

3分钟ted演讲稿做自己4

尊敬的各位老师、亲爱的各位同学:

大家好!我是来自五、二班的何燕玲,我今天为大家演讲的题目是《爱我中华,做好自己》。最近我们的校园里掀起了主题读书活动的热潮,在班级里,课下、午休、业余,好多同学都在热情高涨地捧读《复兴中华,从我做起》这本书。读着这本书,我不禁为祖国十年的巨变感到无比自豪;我因一个又一个感人的故事而饱含热泪。

祖国的强大,民族的复兴,离不开华夏儿女的忠诚爱国和努力拼搏;离不开华夏儿女的默默奉献和不懈奋斗。打开历史的长卷,因为爱国,岳飞背刻“精忠报国”;因为爱国,江姐笑对酷刑——“竹签子是竹子做的,而共产党员的意志是钢铁铸成的”。

再翻开新时期的篇章,我们听到了“雷锋出差一千里,好事做了一火车”的佳话;看到了朱光亚、黄光辉等学识渊博、潜心钻研的科学家;看到了杨利伟、刘洋等兢兢业业的航天英雄;看到了最美司机吴斌、最美教师张丽莉在危难时刻,替他着想的美好心灵。他们在各行各业的战线上,释放着自己的光和热,为祖国的兴盛做出了自己的贡献。他们有卓著的成就,有超凡的表现,他们名载史册、家喻户晓。跟他们比起来,我们显得似乎渺小而平凡。作为华夏子孙,老师教育我们要爱我的祖国。作为一名小学生,我们不必追求英勇献身、无需做得惊天动地。我们可以学习的是他们刻苦勤奋、默默奉献的品质,能够做到的是——从现在做起,从点滴做起,做好自己,以实际行动来表达对祖国的爱。

孝亲敬长、团结同学、关心他人,做个懂礼仪的孩子;认真听讲、按时作业、温故知新,做个会学习的孩子;自觉关灯、自觉关掉水龙头、不乱倒饭菜,做个“节约小标兵”;多种一棵树,多栽一株草,多参加一次环保活动,做个“环保小卫士”;尊重祖国的语言文字,热爱中华民族的优秀文化,做个传承文明的孩子??这些点滴小事,如果你能自觉做,能坚持做,相信好习惯就会与你同行,伴随一生。

俗话说“不积跬步,无以至千里;不积小流,无以成江海。”如果连这些生活中的点滴小事,我们都不能做好,那将来长大,又如何去成就一番大事,如何去担当复兴中华的责任呢?

亲爱的同学们,“爱我中华,复兴中华”不能光喊口号,而是要我们拿出实实在在的行动。从现在做起,从点滴做起,做好自己!让我们共同宣誓:顽强拼搏!自强不息!立志为中华民族的伟大复兴而勤奋学习!

谢谢大家!

3分钟ted演讲稿做自己5

亲爱的朋友们:

人人都要自己学会感恩,感谢天地,感谢命运,感谢一切一切的所有,天地虽宽,道路坎坷,但是只要心中有爱,心存感恩,就会努力做好自己,花开花落也一样会珍惜。

感恩是积极向上的思考和谦卑的态度,它是自发性的行为。当一个人懂得感恩时,便会将感恩化做一种充满爱意的行动,实践于生活中。一颗感恩的心,就是一个和平的种子,因为感恩不是简单的报恩,它是一种责任、自立、自尊和追求一种阳光人生的精神境界!

感恩是一种处世哲学,感恩是一种生活智慧,感恩更是学会做人,成就阳光人生的支点。从成长的角度来看,心理学家们普遍认同这样一个规律:心的改变,态度就跟着改变;态度的改变,习惯就跟着改变;习惯的改变,性格就跟着改变;性格的改变,人生就跟着改变,愿感恩的心改变我们的态度,愿诚恳的态度带动我们的习惯,愿良好的习惯升华我们的性格,愿健康的性格收获我们美丽的人生!

朋友相聚,酒甜歌美,情浓意深,我感恩上苍,给了我这么多的好朋友,我享受着朋友的温暖,生活的香醇,如歌的友情。走出家门,我走向自然。放眼花红草绿,莺飞燕舞,我感恩大自然的无尽美好,感恩上天的无私给予,感恩大地的宽容浩博。

生活的每一天,我都充满着感恩情怀,我学会了宽容,学会了承接,学会了付出,懂得了回报。所以,每天,我都有一个好心情,我幸福的生活着每一天。我懂得,学会了感恩,才会在生活中发现美好,用微笑去对待每一天,用微笑去对待世界,对待人生,对待朋友,对待困难。宽容和感动可以化腐朽为神奇,化冰峰为春暖,化干戈为玉帛。

学会感恩,我的一颗心永远被温暖笼罩,被甜美滋润,我的生活中没有冰雪,没有冲突,没有愤怒,没有战争,没有咒骂。

我感恩,感恩生活,感恩网络,感恩朋友,感恩大自然,每天,我都以一颗感动的心去承接生活中的一切。

感恩,是人生的最大智慧;感恩,是人性的一大美德。常怀感恩之心,我们便能够无时无刻地感受到家庭的幸福和生活的快乐。在感恩的世界里,我们还会时时提醒自己:滴水之恩,当涌泉相报!

如果你是一个苦恼的人,你应该学会感恩,因为感恩是驱除你的苦恼的一剂良方妙药;如果你是一个对生活心灰意冷的人,你应学会感恩,因为感恩的时候就是你的身心得到温暖的时候;如果你是一个郁郁不得志的人,你应学会感恩,因为感恩会使你的心情渐渐舒畅,渐渐平和;如果你是一个被生活压得喘不过气来的人,你应学会感恩,因为感恩会使你逐步释放重负、放松身心;如果你是一个只顾索取的人,你更应学会感恩,因为感恩会使你变得会适当地给予;如果你是一个快乐的人,你也应学会感恩,这样,你的快乐就会取之不尽......

对别人感恩,相应会得到他人对你的感恩,所以你是得到了两份好心情。

学会感恩,就是学会了长存感激之情,永存爱心。爱的力量是非凡的,它会把一个人塑造得更为完美。外国有一个感恩节,可咱们中国却没有,那倒无妨,咱们何不把每一天都当作感恩节来过呢。朋友,如果你想有一个好的心境,那不妨试着学会感恩,把每一天都当作你的感恩节。

人们往往会牢记自己的付出,却容易忘记感恩。爱因斯坦说过“每天我都要无数次地提醒自己,我的内心和外在的生活,都是建立在其他人的劳动的基础上。我必须竭尽全力,像我曾经得到的和正在得到的那样,作出同样的贡献。”我们只是个普通的人,不可能像伟人那样对人类有卓越的贡献。但当我们赤裸裸地来到人世,从无知直到长大成人,每时每刻都在享受着大自然、亲朋和无数陌生人给予的一切,我们被爱紧紧围绕着,许许多多人在为我们的成长,我们的生活奉献着、付出过,我们难道不应该永远记住所有人和事,所有爱和恩,为此承担一份歉疚,珍惜、知足现有的一切吗?

感恩是爱和善的基础,我们虽然不可能变成完人,但常怀着感恩的情怀,至少可以让自己活的更加美丽,更加充实。而感恩是需要学习,需要培育的。西方的父母从孩子很小的时候就要求他们写感恩日记,感恩阳光、感恩自然、感恩一切给予微笑和爱的人。

所以培育感恩情结,并非是一朝一夕的功夫,如果人人都有一颗感恩的心,那天天都是感恩节,这世界就会变得更加美丽。

但即使有感恩的心,人们也常常是只记得感谢给我们关心、帮助、掌声的人,在他们需要帮助的时候也会助一臂之力。而少有人去感激伤害、欺骗、打击过我们的人,我们常常对他们是报以怨恨。

其实,对那些伤害过我们、带给我们疼痛的人,我们也应该记得:正是他们让我们对这个世界有了一个更深刻的认识,我们不仅要学会用一颗感恩的心去体会真情,更要学会用一颗感恩的心去驱逐伤害.

愿人人都拥有一颗感恩的心。

ted演讲中英文对照范文第4篇

小计划帮你实现大目标

——Google工程师Matt Cutts在TED的励志演讲稿

A few years ago, I felt like I was stuck in a rut, so I decided to follow in the footsteps of the great American philosopher, Morgan Spurlock, and try something new for 30 days. The idea is actually pretty simple. Think about something you’ve always wanted to add to your life and try it for the next 30 days. It turns out, 30 days is just about the right amount of time to add a new habit or subtract a habit — like watching the news — from your life.

几年前, 我感觉对老一套感到枯燥乏味, 所以我决定追随伟大的美国哲学家摩根·斯普尔洛克的脚步,尝试做新事情30天。这个想法的确是非常简单。考虑下,你常想在你生命中做的一些事情 接下来30天尝试做这些。 这就是,30天刚好是这么一段合适的时间 去养成一个新的习惯或者改掉一个习惯——例如看新闻——在你生活中。

There’s a few things I learned while doing these 30-day challenges. The first was, instead of the months flying by, forgotten, the time was much more memorable. This was part of a challenge I did to take a picture everyday for a month. And I remember exactly where I was and what I was doing that day. I also noticed that as I started to do more and harder 30-day challenges, my self-confidence grew. I went from desk-dwelling computer nerd to the kind of guy who bikes to work — for fun. Even last year, I ended up hiking up Mt. Kilimanjaro, the highest mountain in Africa. I would never have been that adventurous before I started my 30-day challenges.

当我在30天做这些挑战性事情时,我学到以下一些事。第一件事是,取代了飞逝而过易被遗忘的岁月的是 这段时间非常的更加令人难忘。挑战的一部分是要一个月内每天我要去拍摄一张照片。我清楚地记得那一天我所处的位置我都在干什么。我也注意到随着我开始做更多的,更难的30天里具有挑战性的事时,我自信心也增强了。我从一个台式计算机宅男极客变成了一个爱骑自行车去工作的人——为了玩乐。甚至去年,我完成了在非洲最高山峰乞力马扎罗山的远足。在我开始这30天做挑战性的事之前我从来没有这样热爱冒险过。

I also figured out that if you really want something badly enough, you can do anything for 30 days. Have you ever wanted to write a novel? Every November, tens of thousands of people try to write their own 50,000 word novel from scratch in 30 days. It turns out, all you have to do is write 1,667 words a day for a month. So I did. By the way, the secret is not to go to sleep until you’ve written your words for the day. You might be sleep-deprived, but you’ll finish your novel. Now is my book the next great American novel? No. I wrote it in a month. It’s awful. But for the rest of my life, if I meet John Hodgman at a TED party, I don’t have to say, “I’m a computer scientist.” No, no, if I want to I can say, “I’m a novelist.”

我也认识到如果你真想一些槽糕透顶的事,你可以在30天里做这些事。你曾想写小说吗?每年11月,数以万计的人们在30天里,从零起点尝试写他们自己的5万字小说。这结果就是,你所要去做的事就是每天写1667个字要写一个月。所以我做到了。顺便说一下,秘密在于除非在一天里你已经写完了1667个字,要不你就甭想睡觉。你可能被剥夺睡眠,但你将会完成你的小说。那么我写的书会是下一部伟大的美国小说吗?不是的。我在一个月内写完它。它看上去太可怕了。但在我的余生,如果我在一个TED聚会上遇见约翰·霍奇曼,我不必开口说,“我是一个电脑科学家。”不,不会的,如果我愿意我可以说,“我是一个小说家。”

So here’s one last thing I’d like to mention. I learned that when I made small, sustainable changes, things I could keep doing, they were more likely to stick. There’s nothing wrong with big, crazy challenges. In fact, they’re a ton of fun. But they’re less likely to stick. When I gave up sugar for 30 days, day 31 looked like this.

我这儿想提的最后一件事。当我做些小的、持续性的变化,我可以不断尝试做的事时,我学到我可以把它们更容易地坚持做下来。这和又大又疯狂的具有挑战性的事情无关。事实上,它们的乐趣无穷。但是,它们就不太可能坚持做下来。当我在30天里拒绝吃糖果,31天后看上去就像这样。

So here’s my question to you: What are you waiting for? I guarantee you the next 30 days are going to pass whether you like it or not, so why not think about something you have always wanted to try and give it a shot for the next 30 days.

所以我给大家提的问题是:大家还在等什么呀?我保准大家在未来的30天定会经历你喜欢或者不喜欢的事,那么为什么不考虑一些你常想做的尝试并在未来30天里试试给自己一个机会。

Thanks. 谢谢。

Matt Cutts简介:

ted演讲中英文对照范文第5篇

“Be Crazy about sneakers.”————Feedback Almost every basketball fan is dreaming about getting one pair of sneakers of famous brands, like Air Jordan series. Many of them are constantly dedicated to their collections of various sneakers.

But through the speaker’s ideas, a clear marketing network emerged, which was seemingly invisible before. All of us who are fond of collecting limited-edition shoes may not realize that we are part of the market itself, although it isn’t a market at all. This is incredible, but it really exists. Basketball fans are enthusiastic about their beloved stars, and the sneakers endorsed by stars are to support their craze, which means a brilliant commercial opportunity to shoes’ industry. And the brand Nike was one of the biggest owners of profits from its sneakers, it is still earning money from us, and it will be as long as the devotion to basketball stars don’t fade away. In short, the intangible beneficial network is a successful example for sports industry. But what if they improve their commercial system? There will be more profits. Anyway, we can learn a lot from this and utilize what we got.

ted演讲中英文对照范文第6篇

Ihave spent the last years, trying to resolve two enigmas: why is productivity so disappointing in all the companies where I work? I have worked with more than 500 companies. Despite all the technological advance

computers,

IT,

communications, telecommunications, the internet.

Enigma number two: why is there so little engagement at work? Why do people feel so miserable, even actively disengaged? Disengaged their colleagues. Acting against the interest of their company. Despite all the affiliation events, the celebration, the people initiatives, the leadership development programs to train managers on how to better motivate their teams.

At the beginning, I thought there was a chicken and egg issue: because people are less engaged, they are less productive. Or vice versa, because they are less productive, we put more pressure and they are less engaged. But as we were doing our analysis we realized that there was a common root cause to these two issues that relates, in fact, to the basic pillars of management. The way we organize is based on two pillars.

The hard—structure, processes, systems. The soft—feeling, sentiments, interpersonal relationship, traits, personality. And whenever a company reorganizes, restructures, reengineers, goes through a cultural transformation program, it chooses these two pillars. Now we try to refine them, we try to combine them. The real issue is – and this is the answer to the two enigmas – these pillar are obsolete. Everything you read in business books is based either two of the other or their combine. They are obsolete. How do they work when you try to use these approaches in front of the new complexity of business? The hard approach, basically is that you start from strategy, requirement, structure, processes,

systems,

KPIs,

scorecards,

committees, headquarters, hubs, clusters, you name it. I forgot all the metrics, incentives, committees, middle offices and interfaces. What happens basically on the left, you have more complexity, the new complexity of business. We need quality, cost, reliability, speed. And every time there is a new requirement, we use the same approach. We create dedicated structure processed systems, basically to deal with the new complexity of business. The hard approach creates just complicatedness in the organization. Let’s take an example. An automotive company, the engineering division is a five-dimensional matrix. If you open any cell of the matrix, you find another 20-dimensional matrix. You have Mr. Noise, Mr. Petrol Consumption, Mr. Anti-Collision Propertise. For any new requirement, you have a dedicated function in charge of aligning engineers against the new requirement. What happens when the new requirement emerges? Some years ago, a new requirement appeared on the marketplace: the length of the warranty period. So therefore the requirement is repairability, making cars easy to repair. Otherwise when you bring the car to the garage to fix the light, if you have to remove the engine to access the lights, the car will have to stay one week in the garage instead of two hours, and the warranty budget will explode. So, what was the solution using the hard approach? If repairability is the rew requirement, the solution is to create a new function, Mr. Repairability. And Mr. Repairability creates the repairability process. With a repairability scorecard, with a repairability metric and eventually repairability incentive.That came on top of 25 other KPIs. What percentage of these people is variable compensation? Twenty percent at most, divided by 26 KPIs, repairability makes a difference of 0.8 percent. What difference did it make in their action, their choices to simplify? Zero. But what occurs for zero impact? Mr. Repairability, process, scorecard, evaluation, coordination with the 25 other coordinators to have zero impact. Now, in front of the new complexity of business, the only solution is not drawing box es with reporting lines. It is basically the interplay. How the parts work together. The connection, the interaction, the synapse. It is not skeleton of boxes, it is the nervous system of adaptiveness and intelligence. You know, you could call it cooperation, basically. Whenever people cooperate, they use less resources. In everything. You know, the repairability issue is a cooperation problem.

When you design cars, please take into account the need of those who will repair the cars in the after sales garage. When we don’t cooperate we need more time, more equipment, more system, more teams. We need – when procurement, supply chain, manufacturing don’t cooperate we need more stock, more investories, more working capital. Who will pay for that? Shareholder? Customers? No, they will refuse. So who is left? The employees, who have tocompensate through their super individual efforts for the lack of cooperation. Stress, burnout, they are overwhelmed, accidents. No wonder they disengage. How do the hard and the soft try to foster cooperation?

The hard: in banks, when there is problem between the back office and the front office, they don’t cooperate. What is the solution? They create a middle office.

What happens one years later? Instead of one problem between the back and front, now have to problems. Between the back and the middle and between the middle and the front. Plus I have to pay for the middle office. The hard approach is unable to foster cooperation. It can only add new boxes, new bones in the skeleton. The soft approach: to make people cooperate, we need to make then like each other. Improve interpersonal feelings, the more people laike each other, the more they will cooperate. It is totally worng. It even counterproductive.

Look, at home I have two TVs. Why? Precisely not to have to cooperate with my wife. Not to have to impose tradeoffs to my wife. And why I try not to impose tradeoffs to my wife is precisely because I love my wife. If I didn’t love my wife, one TV would be enough: you will watch my favorite football game, if you are not happy, how is the book or the door? The more we like each other, the more we avoid the real cooperation that would strain our relationships by imposing tough tradeoffs. And we go for a second TV or we escalate the decision above for arbitration.

Definitely, these approaches are obsolete. To deal with complexity, to enhance nervous system, we have created what we call the smart simplicity approach based on simple rules. Simple rule number one: understand what others do. What is their real work? We need go beyond the boxes, the job description, beyond the surface of the container, to understand the real content. Me, designer, if I put a wire here, I know that it will mean that we will have to remove the engine to access the lights. Second, you need to reinforce integrators. Integrators are not middle office, they are managers, existing managers that you reinforce so that they have power and interest to make others cooperate. How can you reinforce your managers as integrators? By removing layers. When there are too many layers people are too far from the action. Therefore they need KPIs, metrics, they need poor proxies for reality. They don’t understand reality and they add the complicatedness of metrics, KPIs. By removing rules—the bigger we are, the more we need integrators, therefore the less rules we must have, to give discretionary power to managers. And we do the opposite – the bigger we are, the more rules we create. And we end up with the Encyclopedia Britannica of rules. You need to increase the quanitity of power so that you can empower everybody to use their judgment, their intelligence. You must give more cards to people so that they have the critical mass of cards to take the risk to cooperate, to move out of insulation. Otherwise, they will withdraw. They will disengage. These rules, they come from game theory and organizational sociology. You can increase the shadow of the future. Create feedback loops that expose people to the consequences of their actions. This is what the automotive company did when they saw that Mr. Repairability had no impact. They said the design engineers: now, in the three years, when the new car is launched on the market, you will move to the after sales network, and become in charge of the warranty budget, and if the warranty budget explodes, it will explode in your face. Much more powerful than 0.8 percent variable compensation. You need also to increase reciprocity, by removing the buffers that make us self-sufficient. When you remove these buffers, you hold me by the nose, I hold you by the ear. We will cooperate. Remove the second TV. There are many second TVs at work that don’t create value, they just provide dysfunctional self-sufficiency.

You need to reward those who cooperate and blame those who don’t cooperate. The CEO of The Lego Group, JK, has a great way to use it. He say, blame is not for failure, it is for failing to help or ask for help. It changes everything. Suddenly it becomes in my interest to be transparent on my real weakness, my real forecast, because I know I will not be blamed if I fail, but if I fail to help or ask for help. When you do this, it has a lot of implications on organizational design. You stop drawing boxes, dotted lines, full lines; you look at their interplay.

上一篇:沈阳解放军202医院范文下一篇:五年级的作文500字范文